Skip to content

Conversation

@mbrukman
Copy link
Member

@mbrukman mbrukman commented Jan 3, 2019

This line is not supposed to be a specific copyright holder or year;
it's a template line, and should have been transferred as-is from the
Apache 2.0 license, which can be found at
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt

@mbrukman mbrukman requested a review from pluradj January 3, 2019 03:25
@mbrukman mbrukman force-pushed the update-license-copyright branch from b91a7b8 to 8030d48 Compare January 3, 2019 03:28
This line is not supposed to be a specific copyright holder or year;
it's a template line, and should have been transferred as-is from the
Apache 2.0 license, which can be found at
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt

Signed-off-by: Misha Brukman <mbrukman@google.com>
@mbrukman mbrukman force-pushed the update-license-copyright branch from 8030d48 to 7a22b38 Compare January 3, 2019 03:51
Copy link
Member

@pluradj pluradj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

You're right, the license file should be a duplicate of the Apache 2 license, then Copyright 2019 JanusGraph authors would be applied when adding copyright and license to source files.

@pluradj pluradj merged commit e546fac into JanusGraph:master Jan 3, 2019
@mbrukman mbrukman deleted the update-license-copyright branch January 3, 2019 22:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants